POLITIK KEBOHONGAN, POLITIK KEBENARAN, DAN DEMOKRASI INDONESIA: PERSPEKTIF ETIKA POLITIK BUDDHISME
Abstract
Politik pada hakikatnya merupakan cara mengatur sebuah pemerintahan demi kebaikan warga negara berdasarkan nilai-nilai etis universal. Namun, hakikat politik ini dihancurkan oleh para pelaku politik yang secara sadar menyebarkan opini dan infomasi yang tidak benar demi kepentingan politik pribai dan kelompok mereka sendiri. Artikel ini merupakan sebuah eksposisi kritis terhadap politik kebohongan (politics of lying), politik kebenaran (politics of truth), dan demokrasi Indonesia dari perspektif etika politik Buddhisme. Argumentasi utamanya ialah politik kebohongan mengabaikan prasyarat-prasyarat epistemik tentang rasionalitas, kritik, kebebasan, keterbukaan, and partisipasi publik untuk mendiskusikan mengenai isu-isu bersama. Pendalaman demokrasi di Indonesia mengandaikan perwujudan prinsip-prinsip etika “politik kebenaran” seperti rasionalitas, kritik, kebenaran, kesetaraan, keterbukaan, dan partisipasi inlusif warga negara dalam proses pengambilan keputusan tentang masalah-masalah bersama.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Adiputra, W.M. (2021). “Antara Kuasa Kebohongan dan Kebebasan Beropini: Analisis Wacana Foucauldian pada Hoaks Pandemi Corona di Indonesia.” Interaksi: Jurnal Komunkasi 10(1): 12-21. https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.10.1.12-21.
Agree, Sam. (2000). Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices, and Perspectives. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Aguas, Jove Jim S. (2023). “The Critical Role of Philosophy in the Future of the Philippines.” Philosohia: International Journal of Philosophy, 24(1): 168-181.
Aristotle. 1995. Politics: Books I and II, translated with a Commentary by Trevor J. Saunders. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2012). “Struktur Hukum dan Hukum Struktural Indonesia.” Dalam Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Dialektika Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Cetakan Pertama, 19-44. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Bernstein, Mark H. (1998). On Moral Considerability: An Essay on Who Morally Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bhat, Mohd. Yousuf. (2004). “Good Governance: A Promise for Justice.” The Indian Journal of Political Science 65(2): 221-234.
Bhikku, Thanissaro. (2016). “Truths with Consequences.” https://www.buddhistinquiry.org/article/ truths-with-consequences/, diakses 25 Maret 2023.
Bodhi, Bhikkhu. 1999. The Noble Eightfold Path: The Way to the End of Suffering. Kandy: Buddhist
Castro, Juan Samuel Santos. (2019). “Políticos Mentirosos Y Tramposos Democráticos: ¿Es La Mentira Política Diferente De Otras Clases De Mentiras?” Universitas Philosophica 36(72): 17-25.
Dhammika, Bhante Shravasti. (1989). “Guide to Buddhism A to Z.” http://www.buddhisma2z.com/ content.php?id=157; diakses 3 Maret 2023.
Dryzek, John S. (1995). “Critical Theory as a Research Program,” dalam The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, ed. Stephen K. White, 97-119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dongen, Els van, and Sylvie Fainzang. (2022). “Lying, Misery and Illness: Towards a Medical Anthropology of the Lying.” Anthropology & Medicine, 9(2): 85-95.
Dupré, Ben. (2013). 50 Ethics Ideal You Really Need to Know. London: Carmelite House.
Frankena, William K. 1973. Ethics, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliff, New Jersey: Printice-Hall, Inc.
Harris, Ian. (Ed). (2007). Buddhism, Power and Political Order. London and New York: Routledge.
Harvey, Peter. (2000). An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundations, Values, and Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howard, Jeffrey W. (2019). “Free Speech and Hate Speech.” Annual Review of Political Science 22: 93-109, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051517-012343.
Jayasuriya, Laksiri. (2008). “Buddhism, Politics, and Statecraft.” International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture 11: 41-74.
Jayaram, V. (1999). “The Buddha’s Teaching on Right Mindfulness.” https://www.hinduwebsite.com/buddhism/mindfulness.asp; Internet, diakses 25 Maret 2023.
Khotari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, Second Revised Edition. New Delhi, India: New Age International.
Long, William J. (2021). A Buddhist Approach to International Relations: Radical Interdependence. Gewerbestrasse, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mahon, James Edwin, (2015). “The Definition of Lying and Deception.” https://plato.stanford.edu/ entries/lying-definition/#:~:text=a%20bank's%20ATM).-,1.4%20Intention%20to%20Deceive% 20the%20Addressee%20Condition,untruthful%20statement%20to%20be%20true; diakses 27 Maret 2023.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2011). Why Leaders Lie: The Truth about Lying in International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moore, Matthew J. (2015). “Buddhism and Political Theory.” Philosophy East & West 65(1): 36-64.
Nance, Richard F. 2011. “Tall Tales, Tathāgatas, and Truth on the ‘Privileged Lie’ in Indian Buddhist Literature.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 33(1–2): 75-101.
Payutto, P.A. (1993). Good, Evil and Beyond: Kamma in the Buddha’s Teaching. Kandy, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society.
Prasetyo, Arienda Addis. (2022). “Disrupsi Perpustakaan Sebagai Ruang Publik: Membedah Pemikiran Jurgen Habermas dan Ruang Publik Digital.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 5(3): 213-218.
Purwanti, Afrida. (2019). Bahaya Berita Bohong: Pandangan Umat Buddha di Vihara Avalokitesvara Pondok Cabe terhadap Berita Bohong (HOAK). Skripsi Sarjana Strata Satu, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/ 123456789/48105/1/SKRIPSI%20AFRIDA%20PURWANTI.pdf., diakses 24 Agustus 2023.
Rosenfeld, Sophia. (2021). “Is Lying Actually a Good Thing in Politics?” https://knightcolumbia.org/blog/ lies-and-the-law-is-lying-actually-a-good-thing-in-politics; diakses 27 Maret 2023.
Rutschmann, Ronja & Wiegmann, Alex. (2017). “No Need for An Intention to Deceive? Challenging the Traditional Definition of Lying.” Philosophical Psychology, 30(4): 438-457.
Singh, Deepali, Ansari, Nafees A. & Singh, Shaifali. (2009). “Good Governance & Implementation in the Era of Globalization.” The Indian Journal of Political Science 70(4): 1109- 1120.
Shofwan, Arif Muzayin. (2021). “Etika Ajaran Agama Buddha untuk Membangun Bangsa dan Negara dalam Kebersamaan.” ABIP: Jurnal Agama Buddha dan Ilmu Pengetahuan 7(2): 172-178. https://doi.org/10.53565/abip.v7i2.316.
Tantra, Manggala Wiriya. (2021). “POLITIK DALAM PANDANGAN AGAMA BUDDHA.” ABIP: Jurnal Agama Buddha dan Ilmu Pengetahuan 4(1): 88-102.
Talisse, Robert B. (2018). “There’s No Such Thing as Fake News (And That’s Bad News).” https://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/theres-no-such-thing-as-fake-news-and-thats-bad-news/diakses 27 Maret 2023.
Tapsell. Ross. (2019). “Indonesia’s Policing of Hoax News Increasingly Politicised.” Perspective 75: 1-10. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2019_75.pdf. Diakses 23 Agustus 2023.
The Buddhist Publication Society. (2018) “The Practice of Loving-Kindness (Metta) as Taught by the Buddha in the Pali Canon.” Compiled and translated by Ñanamoli Thera. https:// www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/wheel007.html; accessed 19 Agustus 2023.
Thera, K. Sri Dhammananda Maha. (2006). “Buddhism and Politics.” https://www.budsas.org/ebud/whatbudbeliev/229.htm, diakses 10 februari 2023.
Thera, Nyanaponika. (1999). The Roots of Good and Evil. Penang, Malaysia: Inward Path Press.
Utami, Pratiwi. (2018). “Hoax in Modern Politics: The Meaning of Hoax in Indonesian Politics and Democracy.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik 22(2): 85-97. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.34614.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47025/fer.v8i2.126
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This Journal Fides et Ratio is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.