DISRUPSI MENURUT FRANCIS FUKUYAMA DAN IMPLIKASINYA PADA TATANAN SOSIAL

Williams Flavian Pita Roja

Abstract


Technology is advancing faster than humans can regulate it. All around us, we can see the positive and negative developments brought about by the ever-evolving technology. Experts refer to these modifications as disruptions. This article will examine disruption through the eyes of Francis Fukuyama. Fukuyama, who views disruption from a more complicated social perspective, does not share Christensen's view that it has a positive influence, particularly economically. Fukuyama called this change The Great Disruption. A significant change that led to a significant shift in the social order. Fukuyama breaks it down into three main categories: rising crime or criminality, deteriorating family dynamics, and a growing circle of distrust. To deal with this shift, people must recognize that they are social beings with the ability to organize themselves, which is a return to human nature. In practical terms, social capital and the social order provide two grounds for support. The first is biological support, which comes from the very essence of humanity. The second is human reasoning ability, which comes up with solutions to issues of social collaboration on its own.


Keywords


disruption; technology; innovation; social order; social capital.

Full Text:

PDF

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Sumber Primer

Fukuyama, Francis. State Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. New York: Cornell University Press, 2004.

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: The Free Press, 1992.

Fukuyama, Francis. The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. London: Profil Books, 1999.

Fukuyama, Francis. Trust: The Social Virtues and Creation of Prosperity. New York: The Press, 1996.

Sumber sekunder

Buku

Christensen, Clayton M. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School

Press, 1997.

Gray, John. Enlightenment's Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age. New York: Routlegde, 1995.

Savitri, Astrid, Revolusi Industri 4.0: Mengubah Tantangan Menjadi Peluang di Era Disrupsi 4.0. Yogyakarta: Genesis, 2019.

Sugiharto, Bambang. Postmodernisme: Tantangan bagi Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius 1996.

Internet

IDC Corporate, Digital Trust Index. Diunduh dari https://www.idc.com, 10 Juli 2020.

Rina Atriana, “Ahok Divonis 2 Tahun Penjara”. Diunduh dari: https://news.detik.com, 9 Oktober 2020.

Stanford University, “Francis Fukuyama.” Diunduh dari https://fukuyama.stanford.edu/, 8 November 2019.

Kamus

Allen, R. E (ed). “Disrupt.” dalam The Oxford Dictionary of Current English. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. “Disrupsi.” dalam Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi ke-4. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2011.

Wyld, Henry Cecil (ed). “Disruption.” dalam The Universal Dictionary of the English Language. London: Gerorge Routeldge & Sons, 1934.

Traktat Kuliah

Ohoitimur, Johanis. “Aliran-aliran Utama Filsafat Kontemporer.” Catatan Kuliah STF Seminari Pineleng, 2019/2020.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47025/fer.v8i2.125

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 Creative Commons License

This Journal Fides et Ratio is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.